More Than Hard Hats: Why Mental Health and Wellbeing Are the Construction Industry's Biggest Unspoken Crisis
Image 1 — Silent Stress: When the job's demands become visible on the face.
Introduction
Every morning on a construction site, the safety briefing covers the same familiar ground. Hard hats. Safety boots. Harness checks. Fall prevention. These physical hazards are taken seriously — measured, monitored, reported and acted upon. Yet there is a danger that nobody talks about, that does not appear on any risk register and that kills construction workers at a rate far exceeding any physical accident.
Mental health.
I have spent thirteen years working on construction sites across Sri Lanka and the Middle East. In all that time, I have never once seen a formal mental health check on a worker. I have seen safety inspections, quality audits, productivity reviews and incident reports. But nobody has ever walked up to a labourer at the end of a twelve-hour shift and sincerely asked — how are you, really?
Construction workers are six times more likely to die from mental health issues than from a dangerous fall. Males working in construction are three times more likely to die by suicide than males in other sectors (Comfy Workers, 2023). And in Sri Lanka, the situation is no different. A study conducted across major Sri Lankan cities found that 97% of construction professionals experienced stress, 87% suffered from anxiety and 70% reported depression — all within the past twelve months (Firose et al., 2025).
The hard hat protects the head. But who protects the mind?
What Is Employee Wellbeing?
Armstrong (2020) defines employee wellbeing as the overall physical, mental and emotional health of workers and argues that organisations have a genuine strategic responsibility to create conditions where people can thrive — not just survive. Wellbeing is not a nice-to-have benefit. It is a core HRM function, and when it is neglected, the costs are real, measurable and serious.
The CIPD (2022) wellbeing framework identifies five interconnected dimensions — physical, psychological, social, financial and purpose. Applying those five dimensions honestly to the typical Sri Lankan construction site produces a picture that should make any HR professional deeply uncomfortable.
Figure 1 — The CIPD (2022) Wellbeing Framework Applied to Sri Lanka Construction
| Dimension | What It Means | Reality in Sri Lanka Construction |
|---|---|---|
| Physical | Health and safety at work | ⚠️ Improving — but physical injuries remain common on many sites |
| Psychological | Mental health and stress management | ❌ 97% report stress — no formal mental health support on most sites |
| Social | Relationships and human connection | ❌ Migrant workers isolated from families — sometimes for years at a time |
| Financial | Fair pay and economic security | ❌ Informal wages — no EPF, no ETF, no job security for the majority |
| Purpose | Meaning, recognition and dignity | ❌ Workers rarely recognised or valued — high turnover reflects this clearly |
Source: Adapted from CIPD (2022)
Video 1 — Breaking the Stigma: Mental Health in the Construction Industry
Source: Lighthouse Construction Industry Charity (YouTube) — Bill Hill, Chief Executive, discusses mental ill-health in construction and how to break the stigma.
The Numbers Are Telling Us Something We Are Ignoring
Winkler and Middleton (2024) reviewed mental health prevalence across the global construction industry and found that poor mental health — including anxiety, depression and stress — are key problems among construction workers that urgently need further examination. The Lancet, one of the most cited medical journals in the world, describes work-related stress, anxiety and depression as having a major negative impact on the construction industry globally.
In Sri Lanka specifically, research has identified five key drivers of mental health deterioration among construction professionals — time pressure, long working hours, excessive workload, insufficient pay and work-life imbalance (Senaratne and Rasagopalasingam, 2017). I would challenge anyone who has worked on a Sri Lankan construction site to say those five things do not sound familiar.
And yet on most construction sites — in Sri Lanka, across the region, around the world — there is no Employee Assistance Programme, no access to counselling, no mental health first aider and no mechanism for a worker to quietly say — I am not managing. I am not OK.
Why Has HRM Failed to Address This?
The answer is not that HR managers do not care. It is that mental health in construction has never been treated as a legitimate management responsibility. Armstrong (2020) is clear that genuine wellbeing strategy requires three things — leadership commitment, line manager capability and organisational systems. In Sri Lanka's construction sector, none of these three things are consistently present.
Toolbox talks address physical safety. Nobody runs a toolbox talk on stress management, burnout or loneliness. And the cultural dimension makes this even harder. Male construction workers — who make up the overwhelming majority of the workforce — are culturally conditioned to endure hardship without complaint. Admitting stress feels like weakness. Asking for help feels like failure. So people carry on until they cannot.
The WHO (2024) has stated clearly that harmful working conditions and poor working relationships can significantly contribute to worsening mental health. In Sri Lanka, 11.9% of the population is affected by mental health disorders — with the majority being of working age. Construction workers are not immune to this reality. If anything, the conditions of the industry make them considerably more vulnerable.
The Migrant Worker — A Crisis Within a Crisis
The wellbeing challenge becomes most acute when we consider Sri Lankan migrant construction workers in the Middle East. These are people who leave their families — sometimes for years — to work in extreme heat, in unfamiliar cultures, living in labour camps, sending every dirham home while struggling with loneliness and profound isolation.
I have worked alongside these men. I have sat with them in labour camps in the evenings and listened to them talk about their children growing up without them, about phone calls home that never quite fill the gap, about the years slipping past. The remittances are visible — a new house, school fees paid, families fed. The invisible cost never appears in any economic calculation. It lives quietly inside people, and sometimes it becomes too heavy to carry.
The ILO (2023) has emphasised that decent work — work that protects human dignity and supports wellbeing — must extend to migrant workers. For many Sri Lankan construction workers abroad, the reality falls far short of that standard.
What Needs to Change — Practically
Armstrong (2020) argues that the role of HRM is not to wait for workers to reach crisis point before intervening. It is to build environments where support is available before things go wrong. This does not require expensive counselling programmes or elaborate wellness initiatives. It begins with something much simpler.
A confidential wellbeing check-in built into monthly supervision meetings. A trained mental health first aider on every site. A toolbox talk on stress and coping strategies delivered alongside the usual safety briefings. A culture where a supervisor can notice that someone seems quieter than usual and ask — is everything alright?
These things cost very little. The cost of not doing them — in lost productivity, in turnover, in human lives — is far greater than most construction companies have ever bothered to calculate.
Conclusion
Sri Lanka's construction industry has made genuine progress on physical safety over the past decade. Hard hats are worn. Harnesses are checked. Accident rates are tracked and reported. That progress is real and it matters.
But the industry remains dangerously blind to the crisis happening inside the minds of the people who build its projects. Ninety-seven per cent of Sri Lankan construction professionals experiencing stress is not a research curiosity. It is a signal that something is fundamentally wrong with how the industry treats its people.
Mental health is not a soft issue. It is not an HR luxury for organisations that can afford it. It is a survival issue — for individual workers, for families and for an industry that cannot afford to keep losing people to something this preventable.
The hard hat is essential. It is time to build something equally robust for the mind behind it.
References
Armstrong, M. (2020) Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 15th edn. London: Kogan Page.
CIPD (2022) Health and Wellbeing at Work Survey Report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Comfy Workers (2023) A Year in Construction Mental Health: Have Things Improved in 2023? [Online]. Available at: https://www.comfyworkers.com/en/insights/educational/a-year-in-construction-mental-health-have-things-improved-in-2023 (Accessed: 7 April 2026).
Firose, M.M., Chathurangi, B.N.M. and Kamardeen, I. (2025) 'Work stress among construction professionals during an economic crisis: a case study of Sri Lanka', Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2024-0411 (Accessed: 7 April 2026).
ILO (2023) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Senaratne, S. and Rasagopalasingam, V. (2017) 'The causes and effects of work stress in construction project managers: the case in Sri Lanka', International Journal of Construction Management, 17(1), pp. 65–75.
WHO (2024) World Mental Health Day 2024: It is Time to Prioritize Mental Health in the Workplace. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Winkler, R.B. and Middleton, C. (2024) 'A review on the prevalence of poor mental health in the construction industry', Healthcare, 12(5), p. 570.
This section powerfully reminds us that the true cost of migrant labour is not only economic but deeply human. While remittances support families and the national economy, the emotional burden of separation, loneliness, and missed years with loved ones is often ignored. Protecting the dignity and wellbeing of migrant workers should be a priority in both policy and practice. How can Sri Lanka and host countries work together to better support the mental wellbeing and rights of migrant workers?
ReplyDeleteThank you Rashmi for your thoughtful reflection! You have highlighted a critical gap that policy often overlooks. I agree that meaningful change requires action from both ends — host countries must move beyond legal reform and enforce genuine worker protections on the ground, while Sri Lanka's SLBFE should provide sustained support throughout the migration journey, not just at departure. Armstrong (2020) reminds us that wellbeing strategy must be proactive rather than reactive — and for migrant workers, this means embedding mental health support into the employment relationship itself, not treating it as an optional extra. Dignity, as the ILO (2023) notes, is non-negotiable in decent work regardless of borders.
DeleteInterested. Your point about workplace pressures was particularly compelling. Could you elaborate on which factors (e.g., long hours or job insecurity) have the greatest impact on workers’ mental well-being?
ReplyDeleteThank you for the question. Based on the research cited in this post, the single biggest driver is the combination of excessive workload and long working hours with no corresponding recovery time. Senaratne and Rasagopalasingam (2017) identified time pressure and overwork as the most consistently reported stressors among Sri Lankan construction professionals. What makes this particularly damaging is the absence of any buffer — no access to support, no culture of disclosure and no formal mechanism to raise concerns. Job insecurity compounds this significantly, especially for workers on informal contracts where any sign of struggle could cost them their livelihood entirely.
DeletePowerful and eye-opening post. Your personal experience really brings depth to the issue, especially highlighting how mental health is often invisible on construction sites despite its serious impact.
ReplyDeleteThe contrast between strong physical safety practices and the lack of psychological support is striking. I agree that simple, practical steps like regular check-ins and mental health awareness in toolbox talks could make a real difference.
The point about migrant workers was particularly impactful, it shows how this issue goes beyond the workplace and affects entire families.
In your view, what would be the first realistic step construction companies in Sri Lanka could take to start addressing this issue?
thank you for the question.The most realistic first step is making mental health a line item in the project budget — not an afterthought. Right now, organisations spend on physical safety equipment without question because accidents have measurable costs. The same logic applies to psychological wellbeing, but the costs of ignoring it are dispersed across turnover, absenteeism and productivity loss rather than appearing as a single incident report. Once organisations start calculating those hidden costs, the business case for even basic mental health provision becomes difficult to ignore.
DeleteThank you for sharing this meaningful blog! I really liked how you emphasized that workplace safety goes beyond physical protection like hard hats and includes mental wellbeing too. It clearly shows how important psychological safety is for employee performance and overall organizational health.
ReplyDeleteThis is very relevant, as stress, burnout, and fear of speaking up can directly impact productivity and retention. Your blog highlights the need for HR to build a supportive culture where employees feel safe, valued, and heard.
How can HR practically embed mental health support into daily work culture rather than treating it as a one-time initiative?
The "one-time initiative" problem is exactly right — and it usually comes from HR treating mental health as a programme rather than a practice. The most durable embedding happens when mental health considerations are woven into existing processes that already happen every day — how performance conversations are structured, how absence is managed, how onboarding introduces new workers to the site. None of these require new programmes or budgets. They require HR to ask different questions within structures that already exist. When mental health becomes part of how work is managed rather than something separate from it, the cultural shift follows naturally rather than being imposed.
DeleteThis is a powerful and well-evidenced discussion of an often overlooked issue in construction HRM. I particularly agree that mental health should be treated as a core organisational responsibility rather than an informal concern.
ReplyDeleteAgreed — and the "core responsibility" framing matters more than it might seem. When mental health is positioned as an organisational responsibility rather than an individual problem, it shifts who is expected to act. The worker is no longer responsible for managing their own stress within a broken system — the organisation is responsible for not building a system that causes it in the first place. That reframing is what drives structural change rather than just symptomatic support.
Delete